Quantcast

South Ohio News

Monday, May 6, 2024

State Rep Justin Pizzulli: 'it was proven throughout the committee process that another judge is needed in Adams County'

Webp justinpizzulli

Ohio state Rep. Justin Pizzulli | ohiohouse.gov/

Ohio state Rep. Justin Pizzulli | ohiohouse.gov/

State Representatives Justin Pizzulli (R-Scioto County) and Jean Schmidt (R-Loveland) have expressed their satisfaction following the House Civil Justice Committee's approval of House Bill 283. The bill proposes an addition of a judge to the Adams County common pleas court and the establishment of two divisions to manage different case types.

Pizzulli stated, "This legislation will not only uplift our dedicated court staff, but it will ensure our children receive the care and protection they deserve." He further emphasized the necessity for another judge in Adams County, stating, "It was proven throughout the committee process that another judge is needed in Adams County." Schmidt echoed Pizzulli's sentiments by saying, "House Bill 283 will help Adams County children and better equip those who are dedicated to serving the county with care."

The bill outlines proposed revisions to sections 2151.07, 2301.02, and 2301.03 of the Revised Code. These changes aim to include a new judge in the Adams County Court of Common Pleas, who would be elected in 2024 and subsequently designated as the Probate and Juvenile Division judge on February 9, 2029. The amendment is deemed an urgent matter requiring immediate attention.

A report from Local 12 highlights that among Ohio's counties, Adams County is one of only four where a single judge presides over common pleas, probate, probation, and juvenile courts.

In contrast to this urgency, Common Pleas Judge Brett Spencer voiced no immediate need for these proposed amendments during a recent hearing before the Civil Justice Committee. According to Local 12's report, Spencer suggested that this initiative seems more like a response to his victory over Barbara Moore in the 2022 general election for the position.

While Spencer refrained from directly commenting on the matter due to ethical rules, he did testify during a November 28 hearing for the bill. He expressed that he is not opposed to the idea of adding a second judge, but questions the process and wishes for a fair consideration of the jurisdiction allocation.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate

MORE NEWS